• Undearius@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    121
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    11 days ago

    This is from the city where it’s illegal to be homeless. One man even collected over $100,000 in fines for being homeless.

    Yeah, that’ll help.

      • moody@lemmings.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        31
        ·
        11 days ago

        Canada does not have debtor’s jail. Nothing will really happen except that more fines will keep racking up. No collection agency is going to take on a homeless person’s debt, so eventually those debts will just disappear, assuming he makes no effort to pay them off.

        In the meantime, if he tries to escape homelessness, it’s a lot harder nowadays to find an apartment with a landlord that doesn’t check your credit, and 100k+ in unpaid debts looks really bad.

    • Bonsoir@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      11 days ago

      It’s not “being homeless” that is illegal, though. It’s drinking in public, begging or sleeping in the metro. And it sure is tough not staying in the metro during winter. There are some organisms that can provide shelter, but not enough for everyone, and it usually cost a couple dollars, which not everyone have everyday. And it’s a real problem on both sides, as the metro was not meant to become a shelter for the homeless, and people have been complaining more and more they feel unsafe there.

      • ImADifferentBird@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        10 days ago

        “The law, in its majestic equality, forbids rich and poor alike to sleep under bridges, to beg in the streets, and to steal their bread.” - Anatole France

      • zaph@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 days ago

        Sure “being homeless” isn’t the crime itself but you’re being naive if you don’t think the laws make homelessness illegal. What are they supposed to do? Go find a piece of land no one has claim to and freeze to death?

        • Bonsoir@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          10 days ago

          And what are we supposed to do? Legalize all drugs and being drunk in public just to avoid having to fine them, and install beds everywhere in the Underground City (and in this post’s case, in emergency stairwells at the Complexe Desjardins) with no regard for their regular use?
          Sure, let’s work on proposing more accessible legal alternatives. Just take note that these laws weren’t created to punish the homeless, but to have a clean and safe public space - which have been degrading for some time now.

            • Bonsoir@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              edit-2
              10 days ago

              That sound pretty much like the “If you’re poor, just buy a house” people.
              I think you don’t know much about Montréal. There are solutions already in place to help homeless people who want to go out of the street, but the housing crisis is pretty new and it will take years to solve. It wasn’t so bad a few years ago.

              • ImADifferentBird@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                11
                ·
                10 days ago

                It’s actually nothing like that at all. What you’re describing is putting a societal problem on the shoulders of individuals. What I’m suggesting is that society should actually fix the problems it has created.

                Every place that has taken a “housing first” approach has seen success out of it. But people insist on making the problem more complicated than it is, because we’ve built an entire society on the false idea that poor people somehow deserve to be poor and anything done to help them is somehow unjust.

                • Bonsoir@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  10 days ago

                  You might not be aware of that, but there is what we call a “housing crisis” right now. There is not enough place to house everyone, and there are not enough construction sites to fix the problem rapidly considering the recent increase in population. It will take years to adjust. You can’t just make a bunch of apartments appear out of nowhere. Doesn’t matter the policy you apply to distribute them.
                  And about social housing, yeah, everybody likes that. It’s more a matter of government inefficiency rather than a lack of will from the population.

      • Danquebec@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        9 days ago

        La Maison du Père costs 1 dollar a night, and they’ll let you in if you explain that you can’t pay the $1.

        Some just don’t like shelters. They don’t like the rules, other people, or fear getting their stuff stolen.

    • snooggums@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      43
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      11 days ago

      Not sure about Canada, but in the US:

      Homeless = no permanent residence, which also includes couch surfing, parents and children who just fled an abusive family member and are temporarily ltaying with friends or relatives, and people who are living in their car. All people without a home.

      Unhoused = homeless people that don’t have a roof over their heads. Might include living in a car.

      • snooggums@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        10 days ago

        In the US they mean different things, as homeless includes people living in other people’s homes. That can include people whose house just burnt down and are living with friends or family because they lost their permanent residence (home). Unhoused is about where they are staying.

        People on the street are homeless and unhoused.

        • leisesprecher@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          9
          ·
          11 days ago

          And you really think people use and understand these terms like that?

          You may be correct in the academic sense, but completely wrong in all other senses.

      • kandoh@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        10 days ago

        Language has power. You’ll notice successful effort on the right to get pundits to refer to Oil as Energy. Oil has negative implications, energy has positive. Homeless has negative implications for the person, unhoused has negative implications for the government.

  • bricklove@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    11 days ago

    What about the people who work there? Are they trying to make them quit then become homeless and leave the mall too?

  • intensely_human@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    10 days ago

    We can solve homelessness once and for all by making every part of civilization just suck as much as possible. If literally no part of our society is capable of supporting safety and life, then all the homeless people will just move along

  • EmoDuck@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 days ago

    What’s with the wording of this title? “Unhoused people” instead of “Homeless”/“Homeless people”

    • kandoh@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      10 days ago

      It’s like the difference between calling someone wittless and uneducated.

      One implies that’s just how the person is, the other implies a failing of society/family.

    • ziggurat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 days ago

      I like the word unhoused, it implies they should just be housed if they are homeless. Everyone should be housed, even if they don’t own a home

  • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    11 days ago

    At least its music, though this does confirm that Baby Shark is something they’d have played at Gitmo if it’d been around 2 decades ago.

    I have been to many places where things like these are everywhere:

    Imagine this but diesel powered, a bit chonkier, and they just emit this high pitched scream (there are other versions called ‘mosquito alarms’), and has extremely bright, blue strobing lights that will induce seizures in anyone susceptible.

    • Aeri@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      10 days ago

      I always feel an urge to sabotage those things when I see them, were only they not covered in literal cameras

      • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        10 days ago

        IR LEDs + Disposable, thick framed novelty glasses

        Clothes you can toss or donate

        Ingress and Egress method about 1/2 mile away from target, different locations and methods for each.

        Ability to sprint for 10 minutes

        Above average situational awareness

        Do not bring your phone

        Don’t return to the area for 3 months

        • Aeri@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          10 days ago

          I mean yeah I reckon I could if I really wanted to but that’s a lot of effort to temporarily disrupt surveillance of a random walmart parking lot

    • Lem Jukes@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      11 days ago

      Oh if baby shark had been around two decades ago…

      They have one of those outside the Home Depot in DC playing classical music to pacify all the day laborers hanging around hoping to pick up work.

  • M0oP0o@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    10 days ago

    Just in case people do not fully grasp the amounts of "doo"s in this song:

    Baby shark, doo, doo, doo, doo, doo, doo.

    Baby shark, doo, doo, doo, doo, doo, doo.

    Baby shark, doo, doo, doo, doo, doo, doo.

    Baby shark!

    Mommy shark, doo, doo, doo, doo, doo, doo.

    Mommy shark, doo, doo, doo, doo, doo, doo.

    Mommy shark, doo, doo, doo, doo, doo, doo.

    Mommy shark!

    Daddy shark, doo, doo, doo, doo, doo, doo.

    Daddy shark, doo, doo, doo, doo, doo, doo.

    Daddy shark, doo, doo, doo, doo, doo, doo.

    Daddy shark!

    Grandma shark, doo, doo, doo, doo, doo, doo.

    Grandma shark, doo, doo, doo, doo, doo, doo.

    Grandma shark, doo, doo, doo, doo, doo, doo.

    Grandma shark!

    Grandpa shark, doo, doo, doo, doo, doo, doo.

    Grandpa shark, doo, doo, doo, doo, doo, doo.

    Grandpa shark, doo, doo, doo, doo, doo, doo.

    Grandpa shark!

    Let’s go hunt, doo, doo, doo, doo, doo, doo.

    Let’s go hunt, doo, doo, doo, doo, doo, doo.

    Let’s go hunt, doo, doo, doo, doo, doo, doo.

    Let’s go hunt!

    Run away, doo, doo, doo, doo, doo, doo.

    Run away, doo, doo, doo, doo, doo, doo.

    Run away, doo, doo, doo, doo, doo, doo.

    Run away!

    Safe at last, doo, doo, doo, doo, doo, doo.

    Safe at last, doo, doo, doo, doo, doo, doo.

    Safe at last, doo, doo, doo, doo, doo, doo.

    Safe at last!

    It’s the end, doo, doo, doo, doo, doo, doo.

    It’s the end, doo, doo, doo, doo, doo, doo.

    It’s the end, doo, doo, doo, doo, doo, doo.

    It’s the end!

  • NotSteve_@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    11 days ago

    I honestly don’t know if this is better or worse than the ear murdering high pitched screeching they play in the stairwells at a mall in Ottawa

  • jaemo@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    10 days ago

    I mean, this will keep me away too, and I’m “housed” and even occasionally legitimately go to malls with money to spend on things. You play even one loop of that song and I’m Swayze.

  • LovableSidekick@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    10 days ago

    Reminds me of when I briefly worked in an office upstairs from the Seattle Mariners headquarters. Every time I went up or down the stairs I could hear the Mariners theme song playing in their lobby, so presumably they had it looping nonstop. I don’t know how that receptionist didn’t run screaming from the building by the end of the day.

  • tiny@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    10 days ago

    Interesting case of military tatics in a civilian settings. First Decide is blasted at the Vatican embassy, then born in the USA is looped at Guantanamo Bay, now this

  • SHOW_ME_YOUR_ASSHOLE@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    11 days ago

    The gas station near me blasts very loud opera music at the area surrounding the building. I think it’s also to prevent kids from loitering as there is a school nearby as well as plenty of homeless.

  • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    9 days ago

    Great way to lose customers

    Having said that, what’s up with the “unhoused” thing? It homeless. Are we now calling it differently because homeless is now all of the sudden insulting? How long until “unhoused” suddenly is a bad word?

    Can we please just stop pushing changing words? Homeless is fine, you’re without a home. It sucks, people should support you, not shun you, but changing words is just virtue signalling that doesn’t do anything to make anything better for anyone

    • Count Regal Inkwell@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      9 days ago

      but changing words is just virtue signalling that doesn’t do anything to make anything better for anyone

      … And if you are the type of neoliberal politician that wants to pretend they care about people while never actually doing anything to help anyone other than the megacorps when you get into power – Then this is literally all you’ll ever do for people. Linguistic fuckery. Making up new words for things. Fucking around with definitions. And you know that there will be an army of people who will defend this, and shoot down people who actually want to do something on grounds that they said the “wrong” words.

      The argument for ‘unhoused’ is that it humanises the person – But it’s really pushing it.

    • explodicle@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      9 days ago

      Homeless what, exactly? Sorry, you’re gonna need to throw in the word “person” just to be clear.

      • Randomgal@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        9 days ago

        I’ll asume y’all are stupid and privileged and not just cruel. Home can be a public shelter, it is about people. A house is a thing you rent or own.

        Not everything is politics, virtue signaling or about you. We use different words because language changes, because society changes. That is why you don’t speak Anglo-Saxon anymore.

        It’s about precision. The condition people are talking about is not having a house, regardless of whether they have a home. This is why unhoused is being used more often.

        It’s not part of an agenda, it is not about you. Grow up.

        • deathbird@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          9 days ago

          It’s not precise. A shelter is just that: shelter, not a home. An apartment can be a home, but is not a house.