• 🇰 🌀 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 🇮 🏆@yiffit.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    The way I discovered Team Fortress, the original mod for Quake, was because I just happened to join a server running TF and had to spend all day downloading the files from the server on a 28.8k modem so I could play on it, and when I finally got to play, I was greeted with a super racist map called Cross the Border where one team had to reach a goal point on the other side of a giant wall, another team was trying to stop them, and a 3rd team that could only spawn as snipers in two small towers on the wall whose goal I don’t even remember.

    I was extremely confused but God damn was it fun.

  • jubilationtcornpone@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    3 months ago

    Me, playing Age of Empires, blissfully unaware that some shmuck with DSL completely obliterated my settlement 45 seconds ago and my dialup connection just hasn’t caught up yet.

  • originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    my fav was bouncing people from the system (bbs) using the call-waiting blip during text-based mud PVP fights… and if you really pissed someone off they would just physically cut your phone line.

  • ugjka@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    3 months ago

    When you have dial up you quickly realize you need a download manager that can resume downloads

  • cRazi_man@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    This has to be the most millennial specific experience I’ve ever come across.

  • DoucheBagMcSwag@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    Anyone with dial up Internet trying to pirate knew the dreaded 4 words “UNEXPECTED END OF ARCHIVE”

    my brother called this “the download fucked itself.”

  • HappyTimeHarry@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    3 months ago

    One of the reasons MP3 took off so well was that “CD Quality” was roughly 1MB a minute of audio, a single song would download in 10-20 minutes not hours. I remember every night before bed i’d dial up, and in the morning before school i’d burn a new CD to listen to on the bus ride.

    • emeralddawn45@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      3 months ago

      I remember getting an mp3 cd player, whoch was revolutionary because suddenly the disc capacity was based on file size, not music runtime. You didnt have to burn whole cds as an album, you could fit a whole 700mb of songs and directories on one cd. It even had a little digital display that would show the filenames and directory tree, so you could have your music all organized just as you would on the computer. Total gamechanger. Then ipods came around a few years later and changed everything again.

      • webhead@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        The frustrating thing was most of the mp3 players had less storage than a damn CD at first, so I just kept chugging along with that thing for quite a while. Honestly 700mb of mp3s was a pretty damn good amount.

      • dream_weasel@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        Except I feel like I remember needing to burn 2 CDs instead: one for the computer or if you were cool and had a car stereo that would play mp3s and one (or maybe several) to put in the walkman or the boom box or whatever.

        Huge binders of sharpie covered CDs… Good times.

        Then the DVD burner came out and started a black market scene at school, but that’s another topic entirely.

  • yesman@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    3 months ago

    Wasn’t one of the major advantages of torrents the fact you could interrupt a download without loosing the partial data?

  • AlecSadler@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    3 months ago

    The comments in this thread are making me feel even older having grown up on 2400bps modem dialing into BBSs, lol.

  • MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    3 months ago

    DSL was such a game changer for so many reasons.

    Not the least of which was that you could be online while someone was using the phone.

      • twinnie@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        3 months ago

        I don’t think people nowadays can comprehend how basic the OG Napster was. You searched for a file and every single person with a matching file would come up as a separate result. When you downloaded you downloaded only from that one person and if they cancelled it or whatever before it finished then it was gone and you had to start again. You couldn’t resume, not even from the same person with the exact same file.

      • Rhaedas@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        Memory fails me, but I want to say that the idea of a re-download finding the end of file and resuming went back even further in history (Zmodem I think was my first exposure to it). The creation of such a miracle was game changing for the very reason OP mentions, along with other interruptions.

  • mavu@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    3 months ago

    posted around 2018? maybe earlier? surely not recently.

    Or did anyone really use dialup in 2009?

    • Chozo@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 months ago

      Dial-up was still somewhat common to see in rural areas around that time, but I think most people had broadband by the mid 2000s (in the US, at least). Our family got broadband in the suburbs around 2003/2004-ish, and it was pretty new for our area at the time.

      • frayedpickles@lemmy.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        It’s still “broadband” by those standards. For most people that was dsl and something in the 0.5-5 Mbps range. Like 3g speeds essentially. Average family wasn’t even getting 4g speeds at home until late 2000s.

  • twinnie@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    3 months ago

    I lived through that, I don’t know why it took 17 hours. It’d take half an hour on a bad day for an MP3 song and there wasn’t really anything else on Napster. I’ve never heard of anyone having audiobooks on there or anything, and it didn’t do movies.