• SlopppyEngineer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      28
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      Lawns became symbols of the elite in England, as wealthy landowners sought to show off their gains via the most ostentatious displays possible outside stately homes.

      Colonizing landowners were keen to replicate the look of a manicured English garden. As such, English imperialism is somewhat to blame for lawns being created around the world, where they became a status symbol, and a sign of wealth and well-to-do.

        • SlopppyEngineer@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          1 month ago

          The point from from old England’s perspective is that keeping the grass at 2 cm requires a whole bunch of resources and people, so only the rich could afford it. Even today, any neighborhood with weeds growing instead of a 2cm lawn is instantly classified as lower class. There often is no practical use or sometimes use for games or walking is when forbidden because it’s a status symbol only.

          It’s like asking what’s the point of owning a Bugatti Chiron that can go 400 kph when you’re stuck in the same traffic jam anyway.

        • jawa21@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 month ago

          It goes back to the origin stated here. It was desirable because they could afford to effectively waste a lot of acreage on a crop that had no benefit. Simply for show.

        • Jumuta@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 month ago

          it’s easier to walk in than a garden with only 100cm-long grass in it

          also looks nicer than a barren garden with no grass

    • MindTraveller@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      1 month ago

      The point is to make home ownership too expensive for black people by wasting land

        • MacN'Cheezus@lemmy.todayOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          I’m sure there must be some based HOAs out there that encourage this sort of thing instead of forbidding it. You just have to not live in Normieville.

            • MacN'Cheezus@lemmy.todayOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 month ago

              I don’t see why it would have to be though. A bunch of oddballs could certainly get together and create one to protect diversity in their neighborhood from a normie invasion.

              • DannyMac@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                5
                ·
                1 month ago

                The most well-intentioned HOAs can easily go to shit when power-tripping assholes, with all the free time in the world, take them over.

              • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                1 month ago

                For the same reason why very few companies are worker owned co-ops: people suck and capitalism doubly so. That’s why we very rarely can have nice things.

                In the case of HOAs, the bad ones (which are the vast majority of them) exist to extract profit (in the form of increasing property values, fining anyone who doesn’t follow their petty rules, and sometimes even take someone’s home for breaking the aforementioned rules) and exert as much control over people as possible.

                In the US at least, laws regarding HOAs are a grotesque combination of under-regulation and regulations specifically crafted to FACILITATE abuse rather than discourage it.

                • MacN'Cheezus@lemmy.todayOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  1 month ago

                  Perhaps, but as long as there is no law that says you can’t have an HOA that fines you for having a McMansion with a monoculture lawn instead of a natural one, it’s at least possible in theory.

          • LasagnaCat@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 month ago

            I pay an HoA, its like $30 a year. While they dont encourage it, they dont care either. They really dont do anything except twice a year they bring out garbage trucks/dumpsters to the nearby school to dump/recycle things too big for a trash can.

  • pseudo@jlai.lu
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    1 month ago

    I wonder is it something specific to the USA or in other countries people are obseessing over nit having them in the lawn?
    I’m in France and every though WE are far from having wild urban meadow or meadow at all, I’ve never heard of people and HOA complaining about dandelion before learning nolawn mouvement on the internet.

    • JasonDJ@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      1 month ago

      Totally a USA thing. Dandelions and Clover are seen as undesirable to our eugenicized monoculture lawns.

      The terrible part is the clover and dandelions and these other early season flowers “weeds” are a very important part of a bees diet.

    • GiddyGap@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Definitely a thing in the US. People spend lots of money to have chemicals poured onto their lawns every year, summer and winter, to keep the weeds away. All of those chemicals have to go somewhere. Probably the groundwater and streams and other bodies of water. Not good.

      • pseudo@jlai.lu
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        I know people who mowed down carefully their lawn and spray them with presticide but they never had a issue with having dandelions, daisies and other common grass flowers, they are usually considered part of the lawn.

    • Destide@feddit.uk
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 month ago

      It’s a weird culture a lot of emphasis on freedom and protecting your home but then you just “ok then” when the local busy body comes around. It’s your land get them told

    • AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 month ago

      I too had never heard of the insane hatred on the poor dandelions before stumbling upon it online.

      They should just eat more salad if it’s such a problem.

    • MacN'Cheezus@lemmy.todayOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 month ago

      I stole this meme from somewhere else so I really don’t know anything about the backstory, so it could have been a grumpy neighbor for all I know.

  • HexesofVexes@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 month ago

    Oh no! Your neighbour will really be upset now…

    What they meant us your lawn has less than the regulation number of dandelions. Quick, go gather seeds and start replanting!