Did he do it for the memes?

  • EnderMB@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    I remember when Biden was picked as Obama’s VP, and everyone laughed because he’s known to make gaffes like this.

    Obviously, there’s a lot of scrutiny on him, but let’s not pretend it’s all because he’s too old. It’s just Biden being Biden, and while he’s probably too old for the job, that’s what happens when you don’t impose upper age limits…

    • Yawweee877h444@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      It’s not just “biden being biden” by a longshot. He is 81 and significantly worse.

      We are rightly worried he’s going to lose against trump.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      “Um… let me be clear. My former VP pick has always sucked. He’s not old. He’s simply got a head full of busted marbles and wasn’t employable anywhere outside of the US Senate. That’s why I endorsed him to run in 2020. You people disgust me. You deserve what you get.”

    • nekandro@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      It’s a concern because Putin, Xi, Khamenei, Kim… They’re all well-spoken. They’re all quick-witted.

      What kind of message does that send would-be American allies in Asia, in the Middle East, in Africa, in South America?

    • DarkCloud@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      He immediately caught and corrected himself on the Putin gaffe, saying his enemies have been on his mind lately… Didn’t do so with the Trump gaffe.

      • hark@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Didn’t it take like a good five seconds before he corrected himself? I wouldn’t say that was “immediately”.

        • DarkCloud@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          All the same, according to his Wikipedia page, he’s been known for such gaffes his whole career, the first mention of such is from 2009, as VP for Obama. So it’s not a new phenomenon for him.

        • DarkCloud@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          Apparently he’s always struggled with speech issues, and grew up being mocked for his stuttering, which he learned to cover with his own techniques/efforts.

          Here’s a video of him discussing this in a TV interview from 15 years ago.

          https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jUFA6JUaAPY

          So it doesn’t appear to be anything new for him.

          • Melatonin@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            Let’s stop equating this stuff to stuttering. It’s not stuttering. I wish it were stuttering.

            Head in the sand mentality is just going to get us a dictatorship in the presidency. I don’t know what it takes for us to realize that we have to do something about this problem. It isn’t going to be enough to just say

            “Well, maybe he’ll get elected anyway.”

            • DarkCloud@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              2 months ago

              Biden’s reputation for gaffes is something you clearly weren’t aware of:

              The remark revived Biden’s reputation for gaffes.[227][221][228]

              Those sources are from 2009.

              Journalist and TV anchor Wolf Blitzer has called Biden loquacious;[692] journalist Mark Bowden has said that he is famous for “talking too much”, leaning in close “like an old pal with something urgent to tell you”.[298] He often deviates from prepared remarks[693] and sometimes “puts his foot in his mouth”.[169][694][695] Biden has a reputation for being prone to gaffes[696] and in 2018 called himself “a gaffe machine”.[697][698] The New York Times wrote that Biden’s “weak filters make him capable of blurting out pretty much anything.”[169]

              Now you do.

              • Melatonin@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                2 months ago

                Fantastic quality for a man in his 80s running for President.

                And it’s worse. This is not normal. We won’t win pretending it’s normal.

  • HappycamperNZ@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Im sorry, im just not getting this.

    You’re worried about someone who says some dumb things when the other choice is a convicted felon, known sexual abuser, who’s actively fighting the democracy you stand for and first act as non-president was to try overthrow your government.

    Trump should be in prison or hung, and you’re comparing him to someone who says dumb things. TRUMP IS A THREAT TO HUMAN RIGHTS, GLOBAL STABILITY AND THE FUTURE OF FUCKING HUMANITY.

    • intensely_human@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Do you not realize that saying the wrong things is a manifestation of mental processes that aren’t connecting right?

      • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Who gives a fuck? Even if that’s the case (which it’s not), it’s better than fascism. This is a pointless line of thinking when it comes to the election.

    • OpenStars@discuss.online
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      TRUMP IS A…

      Then it’s a good thing he’s decided not to run for President. Oh wait, he is running? Then we’re screwed, if we rely on people voting for their best interests, just like in 2016, rather than just throwing their vote into the ring in order to watch the world burn.

      Like it or not, some people aren’t going to vote for Biden. We can acknowledge that now, or acknowledge it later. Btw, I really hope I’m wrong, especially since it looks like we’re going with the latter.:-( I definitely was wrong in 2016, thinking that there was no way that Trump would win against Hillary.

    • Aecosthedark@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Thanks dude, im an Australian, living in Australia but this whole “the non rapist, non fascist, non criminal guy who has a raspy voice, stutter, forgets a name guy is equal or worst to the Fascist, Rapist Paedophile Destroy the World cunt” is fucking nuts. America, grow the fuck up.

      • LustyArgonianMana@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Is it not painfully obvious to everyone including in other nations that we are being uno-reverso’d the classic CIA destabilization plot? Down to supporting right wing movements and fascists? Like our country is under attack. “Grow up” - this is a war being fought online, with weapons we’ve never dealt with before as a society: AI, algorithms, data mining, bot armies

        And truly it’s a sophisticated way to attack the US. We can’t be fought economically or with actual arms; we will win those battles most likely. So if we just attack ourselves and take ourselves out, even if we are just wounded from the devastation to our education system or slowed down from implementing technology/infrastructure, it still massively helps other countries catch up and even pass us in some regards.

        • barsoap@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          Is it not painfully obvious to everyone including in other nations that we are being uno-reverso’d the classic CIA destabilization plot?

          You misspelt FSB. The CIA has no interest in destabilising the US.

    • Bilb!@lem.monster
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      I’m not sure what your point is. Even people voting for Biden because Fuck Trump have reasons to be concerned about the current/next president having pudding brains. Assuming Trump loses, once the election is over that’s still going to be a pressing issue.

      • GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Reagan proved conclusively that an effective government can have a dementia patient as the figurehead. It isn’t ideal, but the people he is surrounded by make a huge difference.

        Now, I’m not saying I agree with the policies his presidency promoted, but it was still effective

    • Deceptichum@quokk.au
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      And Biden enables genocide, among a lifetime history of right wing views such as fighting for segregation.

      Trump and Biden are not good options.

      People should be furious the Dems allowed him to be in this position today, not sucking it up and pushing harder for it.

      • HappycamperNZ@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Do you have a source on the fighting for segregation - first I’ve heard?

        I strongly disagree with Biden enabling genocide - America isn’t the global police, the UNSC are impotent, and even if you isolate to just the US you’re looking at 35 odd years of US strategic interests and policy, dependence on foreign fuel (and denial to other superpowers), global trade chokepoints, a military industrial complex that touches every part of the US economy and American wishes to be a beacon of liberty. No 3 year president can fight that and maintain a stable country.

        Yup, Bernie sanders would have been a much better choice but he’s not a choice that can be made - you can have either blundering buffoon or egotistical, sexist, racist criminal as the most powerful person in the world.

        • bamboo@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          The US funds and arms Israel, which they use to enforce their apartheid, a kind of segregation, as well as carry out the genocide of Palestinians. Biden enthusiastically supplies these weapons knowing they are used to kill innocent civilians every single day.

        • Deceptichum@quokk.au
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          Joe Biden didn’t just compromise with segregationists. He fought for their cause in schools, experts say. - NBC

          This has nothing to do with “world police”, Biden and America are literally sending weapons and money to Israel. They’ve routinely shielded them from the UN, and will intervene with force if anyone tries to stop Israel.

          To quote Biden himself, “I am a Zionist”. He doesn’t even try to hide how evil he is.

          You can either have a shit option or a shit option, you will never have a good option unless you stop supporting the status quo.

      • Gsus4@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        comes with the job of being US president https://chomsky.info/1990____-2/ and Biden is far from the worst in the war crime enabler list, considering he has to deal with the most fascist Israeli government ever…

        If the Nuremberg laws were applied, then every post-war American president would have been hanged.

        So…vote for the least bad option that disempowers you the least.

        • Deceptichum@quokk.au
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          Instead of voting for war criminals, how about not?

          You don’t fill in a hole by taking a lesser amount of dirt out. Likewise you don’t fix the system by voting for the lesser evil.

          • Gsus4@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            Did you see Chomsky’s list? All presidents eventually become war criminals, even if it is by complicit passivity, even that “saint” Jimmy Carter (because of allowing Indonesia to proceed with genocide in East Timor).

            By that standard, even Chomsky as president would have been a war criminal if he had just made a deal to allow Ukraine to be invaded by russia with impunity.

            You get nothing for your cause by letting trump win. Nothing. And you will lose on lots of fronts that affect you personally, including protest, which at least allows you to control the israelis a little bit.

  • Ifera@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Damn, I sort of feel like saying “Thank fuck he isn’t president of MY country”, but then I remember how even my local covidiots felt validated by the giant cheese puff, and how Trump is offering carte blanche to companies, for them to pillage and destroy the living conditions of the whole world.

    All I can do is shake my head, hope for the best and prepare for the worst.

  • maegul (he/they)@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    A saddening phenomenon that’s likely to happen if this continues … is people opening up about how they saw the decline way before the debate but presumed it was a “one off” or “bad night”. I think it’s already started somewhat.

    But the picture that could emerge with pretty high clarity is that “the issue” was covered by an inner group and ignored by those peripherally exposed to it … all instead of the party preparing for it, preparing new potential candidates, and taking seriously the notion from Biden in 2020 that he wouldn’t run in 2024.

    Losing to Trump a second time by sticking to a party elder is going to be a big deal (if it happens of course). It will probably look more like the Dems losing than trump winning, and it prob will look like the Dems allowing it all to happen out of hubris and stupidity, not unlike the RBG fuck up. Could seriously shake the party up?

    • OpenStars@discuss.online
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      And also the entire Hillary fiasco, where she barely campaigned in midwestern states. I wonder if they are truly so wealthy and disconnected as to literally not realize what is going on - for them, the economy is “fine” and so everything is hunky-dory, so if they plan on losing rather than put in someone that they don’t feel that they have as much control over as Biden, then… that might be the end of democracy. Heck, that SCOTUS ruling is already in the past now - maybe they are ready to end the fiction that our votes matter any longer?

      • TheFriar@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        I mean, I don’t think this old babbling windbag should be the candidate either.

        But my thing is, who do the democrats even have to run in place of him? Kamala would lose in a landslide because this is the US and she’s a woman of color (not to mention a cop, so you lose both the left and the “centrist” closeted racist dems and anyone that was still somehow weighing a trump vote (they exist, somehow)), and everyone else in the party has limited appeal. Not to mention the incumbent advantage.

        We shouldn’t be in this position, no matter what. But we are. And we have to face facts that giving up the standard white guy, which is the only kind of candidate that has ever won (except that one time, but that’s seeming more and more like a fluke) with the power of incumbency at his back is a massive gamble. We can’t afford Biden fucking this up as bad as he is. But I don’t know if we can afford a wildcard either, which is exactly what a totally different candidate would be.

        • OpenStars@discuss.online
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          Four years ago, his age was already a factor. We’ve had four years to build someone else up. Someone who is not even connected to the Gaza situation. Even as a backup option, just in case Biden were to have died, let’s say already by now. Four years. Four summers, four winters, four springs, four falls.

          The conservatives tried and failed miserably, with Desantis, and Nikki Haley, etc. but the liberals… I don’t recall even so much as trying?

          But we could - AOC, Buttigieg, Newsom - there are many to choose from (edit: we could even let them compete - a “debate” if you will - and then pick the best one!). Instead, it looks an awful lot like we are choosing either Trump, or even if Biden barely pulled it off, the numbers would not be convincing to the election deniers.

          Just like in 2016, except somehow doubled down even more so, we choose to stick our heads in the sand and hope for the best, while putting forth zero effort to try to bring about a less-worse outcome? FAAFO I guess, bc we gotta keep going through this same scenario over and over again, until we either learn, or democracy itself gets taken from us by the grown-ups (meaning those willing to expend effort towards reaching their goals, though not necessarily the good guys, and to be clear in this case they are very very evil ones).

          • TheFriar@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            Their plan was Kamala. She was their backup option. She is young and the entire discussion when she was chosen was how she would be there when Biden steps down or backs out after four years like he said he was going to do. I’m not saying she was at all a good choice. She has too much baggage and nowhere near broad appeal. Is it pathetic that some of that has to do with her being a woman? And a woman of color at that? Of fucking course. But I don’t think the democrats even really acknowledge that out of fear of it ever being leaked that it was discussed and the news cycle being weeks of “dems racist.” Its performative bullshit. I think they desperately want to be the party to elect the first woman, and they were willing to back door her via Biden. But that’s a stupid plan that doesn’t get to the heart of the issue of our lack of diversity in executive politics.

            But here we are, just like we had with Ginsberg. She was too stubborn to step down when she was clearly dying. And we got a lifetime appointment in Barrett. Now, Biden is refusing to step down and we’re about to get a lifetime sentence of emperor trump.

            • OpenStars@discuss.online
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 months ago

              The trutly heart-breaking fact of all of this is that the election is breaking down along the lines of which flavor of fascism you want? Both sides also represent neoliberalism - one being the American form and the other being the more Russian variant.

              I am starting to see the Yin & Yang of it all, and like Trump lies to people’s faces, yet in doing so he more honestly gives his particular base what they want (they are mean, vindictive, and crass, so taunting “Baby Killer!” is what they enjoy), while in contrast Biden at least tried to tell the truth, yet as you suggested in a manner as to selectively hide certain other inconvenient truths, but in so doing he failed to play to his own base. Biden from 20 years ago would have done amazing at this, it seems like. Whereas now… well, “he has a cold” (that will not end anytime in the next 5 years).

              Dems are nowhere close to being “liberal”, but they really will lead the country better than the Russian transplanted culture that some are trying (successfully) to import. That is, if they can get elected, which the Blue Magas - like their red counterparts - are flat-out ignoring, seems less likely by the day.

              Oh well, “We the People” have no say in any of this. Or at least, that is the story that we are being told, across all forms of social media, including, sadly, the Fediverse as well (I am surprised that your and my comment does not have tens of downvotes already - it seems like the brigade is getting fatigued and not willing to chase down every comment that expresses the slightest doubt about Biden and pounce upon it). So just like with RBG, and even more like Hillary 2016, we will see what happens, I guess!? Those who refuse to learn from their history are doomed to repeat it, “but I’m sure that everything will work out fine this time!” (/s, though genuinely would be true if interpreted as a statement of hope rather than certainty as it says)

      • maegul (he/they)@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Yea, that the term “Blue MAGA” has arisen out of this is kinda telling. Once you see it in the “Biden is our president, if you’re not voting for him you’re part of the problem” types, you can’t unsee it.

        • LustyArgonianMana@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          Isn’t it funny how the Dem talking points often actively discourage people from voting for them? Reminds me of how church groups force people to proselytize, specifically to piss off those people, so they can come back to the church and be told ‘See? All those other people are bad, mean, and stupid. You belong here with us.’

          Except the Dems are doing it to feed their personal moral or intellectual narcissism. It was never about getting votes for that type in the first place - they just wanna feel superior. Which is also why their talking points usually involve guilt trips or other sophistry/bad faith arguments - because they are using this as a proxy to enact narcissistic abuse. If Dems were forced to argue a real position, they would have to become leftists through that honest argumentation (reality has a leftwing bias). There’s a reason none of them are leftists (Dems are centrists). There are talking points from the 70s and 60s they could be picking up, progressive ideas like child care for all (which used to be something Republicans favored)- the point is to prevent progress while being as narcisstically proud of that as possible.

          And truly, narcissism and moral degradation have really really really fucked up our country. And by moral degradation, I mean we’ve become a disrespectful country, almost no community (because we sold it for capital), abusive, and PROUD of that abuse. That’s the only way a man with 34 felonies, who’s raped numerous adult women AND CHILDREN INCLUDING A 12 YEAR OLD, could be a candidate for president.

          It disgusts me.

        • HappyStarDiaz@real.lemmy.fan
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          Oh yea Cult Jr is a real thing right now. Which I could life with IF IT WASN’T SO DAMN CLEAR BIDEN WILL NOT WIN THE ELECTORAL COLLEGE no matter how much Blue Maga Cult Jr berates us. I’m voting for Joe if I have to ya dims, it isn’t who you have to convince and your cult Jr bullshit sure ain’t gonna.

    • girlfreddy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Clooney said Biden isn’t the same man from 2020. Whatever is going on … never mind his age … is getting worse/more difficult to handle.

      It’s time for him to recognise that.

    • LustyArgonianMana@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Not just the RBG fuckup, but also them backing Hillary and openly saying they don’t have to hold fair primary elections re: Bernie, and they kinda fucked up with Gore too

    • bigFab@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      The all-anti-Trump voters reasoning is that a 2 yo pot smoking chimpance would do better off. So they elect it.

      I feel sorry for u americans, u’r truly fucked up anyways.

  • spujb@lemmy.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    is this good for the Biden campaign guys someone let me know i can’t tell

  • Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Even if he goes full and permanent vegetable, he’s still not Trump. Top priority is stopping Orange Hitler from taking control again, so please for the love of human rights, vote for whoever has the the best shot at beating him - if that’s Biden, cool. If it’s Harris, cool. If it’s a literal ham sandwich, fucking fine - all three are orders of magnitude more qualified to do the job then Trump.

    • Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Yeah, I’ll vote blue… But get this fucker off the ticket. I’d much rather it be Kamala, or like… Nearly anyone really.

      • Jax@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        I think Kamala would be one of the single worst candidates we could put forth, but what do I know? I only worked for the dumpster fire of a DoJ she was partly responsible for.

      • fine_sandy_bottom@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        I’ve been trying to be positive about him but he’s really indefensible at this point.

        His hubris is very likely going to fuck things up for everyone.

        Any other candidate will wipe the floor with trump.

      • Xanis@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Maybe. Though I say we just come together, get his ass in, and then in the first year also get his ass out and let the VP or Speaker step in. Like it or not, changing now IS risky and it is arguable whether it’s the better choice. I’ll go with what the majority chooses because fighting against Trump and the GOP is what’s important.

        Let me repeat: We are in the game where we must do what the Republicans do and come together against a common enemy. So I recommend everyone agree on a candidate then shut up and checkmark that box. We can go back to verbally juxtaposing our positions through digital larping, or whatever it is we do when most of us forget politics exist for four years.

      • zarkanian@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Yeah, the question isn’t who Democrats will vote for. It’s who independents will vote for. And there are a lot of independents.

        Relying on the “Never Trump” vote to win this election feels like a terrible risk.

        • ShepherdPie@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          And if we’re simply relying on “never Trump” then it shouldn’t matter if Biden steps down because the goal is still the same.

        • OpenStars@discuss.online
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          We don’t have democracy anymore.

          First, the SCOTUS ruling did away with that last week, but let’s ignore that for now…

          We have a fascist authoritarian in charge who refuses to even consider stepping down until he dies - certainly he is not going to let the people decide who gets to be the Democratic nominee - vs. someone who will become a dictator for life and do the same, but somehow much, MUCH worse.

          I hope that many people vote Blue No Matter Who… yet I fear that many independents won’t.

            • OpenStars@discuss.online
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 months ago

              It’s a bit hyperbolic in this context, yet also technically accurate in a surprising number of ways, though mostly I was focusing on how he won’t allow an election to determine who gets to be the Democratic nominee. Also, he has the legal ability to murder his opponents, and is both supporting (in Gaza) even while also decrying (in Ukraine) genocide. Anyway, the point is that he is suppressing opposition (from within his own party, by not allowing a debate about who may replace him), which yes he has the legal ability to do, fwiw. So he is not much of one perhaps, but has some characteristics not entirely dissimilar to one.

              • TheFrirish@jlai.lu
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                2 months ago

                yeah those observations are fair. Regardless now I’m afraid Trump has sealed his win with this shooting. His voters are going to be mobilised like never before for the election

        • FatCrab@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          The question is who will turn out to vote. The number of “independents” who don’t overwhelmingly vote republican or democratic is vanishingly small. This is found time and time again. Ultimately it’s a question of which electorate turns out and which is demotivated enough not to.

    • Avialle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Going into survival mode forever, where either party can do whatever the frick they want, because they others mustn’t win! Nice system you got there, where it’s like 50\50 every time!

      They present you a Trump and therefore they can even kill your kids, as long as Trump doesn’t win. It’s a scam… both parties are in it. But they divided you all so perfectly fine, you stopped thinking a long time ago.

      Looking forward to your comments, telling me about NO BOth SIdeS!

      • 9tr6gyp3@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Its truly an absolute shit system and it keeps itself propped up this way. What will it even take to see blue and red completely removed? Theyre both terrible options for the future of our world, but when November comes around, they’re still on the ballot.

        Until a revamped Constitution is written by people of all genders, colors, faith, wealth, and education, this will never end.

        We can do better than this and it needs to happen now. Its already too late, but we can help slow the damage to our planet if we act quickly.

        Tired of these popularity contests when we’re literally living in a mass extinction.

      • Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Not sure why the downvotes. The American duopoly is a scam, you are very right. If there is any hope for change it needs to start lower down the food chain. Support the forward party, get involved in local politics, rally against gerrymandering as a hard as possible.

    • Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      I think this is a dangerous attitude. He’s made some gaffs recently but overall has not been a terrible person or leader. Supporting the possibility of dropping a candidate this late in the game especially when there are no super star saviors waiting in the wings is the kind of party weakness the GOP would eat up and is a recipe for failure. You don’t have to love him at this point, but it’s too late to start over, just suck it up make a donation to his campaign and vow to become more involved in political change at earlier levels so hopefully we are not in this mess again.

      • VintageTech@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        I’m voting Joe because he is still the only qualified candidate for the job. The package he brings is a Vice President who could do the job if he were to step down due to health/age concerns to guarantee a female President as his dream come true. She then gets to pick her Vice President which should absolutely be AOC. The opposition has no convincing argument to draw this out in a court as they would need to present their arguments to AOC for rebuttal,

        It’s just so batshit crazy it can’t fail.

        • lightnsfw@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          Since when has the opposition needed convincing arguments to drag things out? They’ll come up with whatever bullshit they want just to keep stuff from moving forward until they get the ball again.

        • wewbull@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          I’m voting Joe because he is still the only qualified candidate for the job.

          There’s a couple of hundred million other qualified candidates in the US. If you’re looking for politicial experience, there’s several hundred in Washington alone.

          Dems have totally failed to bring through the next two or three generations of candidates. That the party feels that he’s their only choice is shameful.

  • DarkCloud@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    He did pick up on the Putin gaffe and immediately corrected himself and explained that his enemies have been on his mind lately.

    He didn’t correct calling Kamala Harris Trump.

    He’s been known for making gaffes since he was Obama’s vice president. From his Wikipedia page:

    The remark revived Biden’s reputation for gaffes.[227][221][228]

    Those sources are from 2009.

    Journalist and TV anchor Wolf Blitzer has called Biden loquacious;[692] journalist Mark Bowden has said that he is famous for “talking too much”, leaning in close “like an old pal with something urgent to tell you”.[298] He often deviates from prepared remarks[693] and sometimes “puts his foot in his mouth”.[169][694][695] Biden has a reputation for being prone to gaffes[696] and in 2018 called himself “a gaffe machine”.[697][698] The New York Times wrote that Biden’s “weak filters make him capable of blurting out pretty much anything.”[169]

    He has struggled with a stutter most of his life, which he learned to cover up.