• Hugh_Jeggs@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        56
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        Oh the entire continent is fair game

        Don’t make me post a journey from County Cork to Vladivostok you daftie 😂

      • Cloudless ☼@lemmy.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        37
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        OP said eurobean. As far as I know, Europe is a continent. Anyway, borders are meaningless.

      • Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        except that’s not the continent, that’s all within the EU, which is equivalent to the USA.

        The uncomfortable truth is that the US isn’t special, and you can’t use the size of it to justify things being shit.

        • Vent@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          The EU is not at all equivalent to the USA. The US federal government has a looot more power than the EU and the states a lot less autonomy than EU countries. Also, culture is more homogeneous across the US than across the EU.

        • canihasaccount@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          EU is still smaller

          But the main reason the US can’t handle the same stuff at a federal level that the EU can is population density. The US government can’t afford to nationalize rural healthcare given how rural the US can be–especially with their debt/GDP at the moment. Give it another few hundred years and the US might catch up to Europe in that respect.

      • Iron Lynx@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        2 months ago

        Counterpoint: all countries in the European case are in the Schengen area, and you can make the entire journey without ever having to take your passport out of your pocket. The same cannot be said in the American case.

    • Iron Lynx@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      If we’re staying on land within the Schengen Area, from the sea in southwest Portugal, all the way to just before the Estonian-Russian border at Narva is 2 days. And it’s Schengen the whole way there, so no border checks anywhere on the way.

    • popcap200@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Is this something people actually do? I know here in the states we have the cannonball run. I doubt people actually drive the whole route very often.

  • Lemmeenym@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    2 months ago

    My mind can’t comprehend those walking and biking numbers. The walking is about 70 miles a day. That’s more than double the average distance of a one day ultra marathon done everyday for a month and a half. The biking distance is about 255 miles a day. Roughly 2.5x the average daily distance for the Tour de France. I want to meet the people who can do that.

    • scoobford@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      49
      ·
      2 months ago

      Google maps doesn’t account for breaks. They’re assuming you can walk at 3mph, and however much time you need to rest and eat is up to you.

      Just like 1 day and 23 hours is only drive time. They’re not accounting for the naps that you will definitely need.

      • Iceblade@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 months ago

        Yep, doing that drive in that time would essentially require at least two people taking shifts driving - or one dangerous madman on some kind of drugs.

    • FanBlade@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      2 months ago

      I believe it’s assuming you’re not taking breaks, in which case I think they’re a bit more reasonable is expected walking speed but perhaps less reasonable in regards to a persons ability to go without sleeping :)

    • intensely_human@lemm.ee
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 months ago

      It takes me 20 minutes to walk one mile at a normal pace. That would mean walking pretty much the whole 24 hours.

  • OutlierBlue@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    47
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    2 months ago

    The Eurobean Mind Cannot Comprehend

    Cannot comprehend miles? Yeah, use a measurement system that makes sense!

  • gamermanh@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    The real thing that breaks the Euro mind about this is that you go all that way and cross 3 rails, all quite close together all things considered

    #america

    • GBU_28@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      It’s cause on that route the rails are over/under passes

    • jake_jake_jake_@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      if you are on an expressway, and often roads smaller, usually grade crossings are avoided if possible. either the rail is on a bridge, and the road dips under, or the road is on a bridge and crosses the rail. it won’t show as a hazard on the route in either of those cases.

      • gamermanh@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        It’s also insanely inconsistent about showing them depending on zoom level when you look at the same route

        I was just making a joke at our piss poor rail systems expense

        • jake_jake_jake_@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 months ago

          You are still not wrong about our rail system, god forbid a passenger train hold up a freight train for one second, won’t someone think of the shareholders???

  • fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    2 months ago

    The big difference here is that most Europeans would never make that drive, while an American would cherish it as a holiday.

    • stembolts@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      47 hours isn’t so bad. I drove San Fran CA to Charlotte NC once and it took 69 hours with stops for sleep included.

      But, your core point is still valid, I’ve kinda always wondered that too. I guess the other replyee explained it, freight trains get priority.

      To compare a train ride I took once, I took a train from Charlotte NC to Detroit MI and that took 24 hours. The drive is 10 hours.

      My takeaway, maybe we should build dedicated rails for hauling people… wait, the auto industry doesn’t want us to have that and lobbies expressly against it? Fuckers. Back to reality, all US politicians are owned by corporations and oppose train infrastructure expansion, and yes, I recognize the main opposition is conservatives. But on this topic quite a few liberals are probably opposing it also, I actually don’t know and am speaking from generic observations.

      Nonetheless, corporate lobbying is the root cause. Aka legalized corruption.

      The reason I highlighted conservatives is because they oppose absolutely anything that costs money (which is everything), and they spend all their efforts banning books/lifestyles/scientific-phrases and well, science and medical advice from science and medicine experts. That’s all banned too. But not guns, because “bans don’t work,” (except in every other civilized first world nation in existence, but wait that doesn’t feel good to think about) so conservatives ignore that.

      So you know, I guess it’s not my fault that I assume Republicans are the root cause to this problem too, since they are the root cause behind most Americans’ ills.

      For all you “both sides bad” people, great, so introduce ranked choice voting in your state. That would disrupt both conservative and liberal life-long politicians. If you won’t do that, when you say “both sides bad” you are actually saying “Republicans aren’t that bad”.

      Ranked choice voting, bitches. Do that shit. Read about how it works before you go ask the people in power and media-shills about it, spoiler, they fucking hate the idea because it would dethrone quite a few of them.

      (Shoots AR15 into the air, the traditional American greeting and salutation for departure).

      Have a nice day.

  • Wogi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 months ago

    The selected route has tolls in Kansas. The northern route will be pretty similar but free, at least until Illinois, I’ve never gone beyond that.