• Savaran@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    77
    ·
    10 months ago

    50s. Getting back to one’s 30s you’re still old enough for people to take you seriously, but the creaking bones and exhaustion hasn’t really started creeping in yet.

  • athos77@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    63
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    10 months ago

    I don’t take it. I give it to my cat, who died one day after her twentieth birthday.

  • ℕ𝕖𝕞𝕠@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    39
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    No earlier than 45. Otherwise you’re headed back into territory where your body and brain are still developing – fuck with that and you might not feel right in your own body.

  • themeatbridge@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    I’m 42. Does everyone get a pill? My wife? My kids? My parents?

    Jumping back 20 years puts me out of sync with everyone I care about. I’m not sure I’d even want it.

    • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      10 months ago

      Out-of-sync not only in lifestyle but you’d now be young enough to possibly outlive your loved ones. Thats a special hell, I’d imagine, burying your parents, wife, and children all because you took a pill to make you younger.

  • BeautifulMind ♾️@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    10 months ago

    I’d take it today. I’m in my 50s, I’m an endurance athlete (I race bikes) and the calculus looks like: if I wait 20 years I get to experience body-age 50-70 twice, but if I take it now I experience 30-50 twice. Living my prime twice is better than enduring my decline twice, thanks

  • jeffw@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    10 months ago

    I’m tempted to say 40, so I can relive the most physically fit part of my life, but maybe I should wait until I’m really old. Not sure

  • ComradeSharkfucker@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    Let’s say hypothetically this repairs organ damage.

    I have 2 choices. I can save the pill for when I or a loved on is in serious danger of death or I can do a shit ton of LSD, like an absurd amount of LSD, enough to actually break me and then reset.

    It’s a tough choice /s

  • CaptPretentious@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    I’d take it right now.

    I’m not married, not dating, and have no kids.

    Getting 20 years back means I can correct a lot of mistakes and I’ll have way more energy and focus to be the me I want to be. My 20s were so stressful I started getting white hair.

      • CaptPretentious@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        I added some words to clear it up. I often write how I talk, which is to say extremely informal. Around my area it all makes sense. It was meant to imply that I don’t have those things so I’m not abandoning anybody or leaving anybody. If you were able to magically de-age yourself it would be viewed as somewhat selfish.

  • SuiXi3D@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    10 months ago

    Assuming this is a tablet, I chop it in half and my wife and I both enjoy being in our twenties again.

    • BradleyUffner@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      Your left side gets 20 years younger while your right side stays the same. Or top and bottom half, depending on how you cut it.

  • Snapz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    10 months ago

    A lot of variables in the magic to consider, but if you retain your knowledge, than 35 back to 15. You’ve essentially matured as far as you will at that point, started a family or married if you will do so, found stabilization in your career or at least moved far down that path, you hit the major milestones.

    So back to 15 and then you live out the bulk of your high school with knowledge to help you actually enjoy learning, slow pace of high school, form lasting lifelong friendships, properly pursue education beyond high school, then live your 20s with a full appreciation for what they are, start saving money the right way, date the right way and invest in all of the tech companies before they get big so that you’re obscenely wealthy through your late 20s and beyond.

    Use the money to line a small island completely with underground dynamite charges. Invite trump, tell him you’re offering him an unlimited budget to make the island into the first trump island and resort, hand him a golden shovel and say, “I’m going to get in this helicopter to get higher up to take a nice cinematic shot of you breaking ground for the press release” when you’re out of the blast radius, press the button. You’ve done one of the greater services to humanity by any living human in history. Enjoy your earned retirement.

  • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    10 months ago

    The day your health becomes a problem requiring more than regular effort to maintain.

    That’ll rewind the clock to a lot of good years that maybe you can push back the decline a little further. Your clock will run out eventually, it’s inevitable. You just want to maximize the good years, not just youth or keeping yourself from death.

  • jwing@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    10 months ago

    For your first 20-40 trip, you could stay childless and live it up, see the world.

    Then, on your second 20-40 trip, you could have kids while still physically fit and able to keep up with them and have fun.

    • Stovetop@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      10 months ago

      It would be weird to have kids with someone who is effectively 20 years younger than you, though.

      You either go with someone physically the same age who is of a completely different generation from you, or you go with someone mentally your age who you may not be able to have kids with without risking a higher chance of congenital disorders.

    • 👍Maximum Derek👍@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      10 months ago

      The problem with that is that (now that I’m in my 40s) I don’t like to be around kids for long periods of time, and have come to see anyone under ~25 as a kid. Would I be able to stand being around myself (or my new peers)?

  • AgentGrimstone@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    40, I want to go back to when my body was in great condition. At 20, I didn’t feel any of the aches and pains I had in my early 30s. It would give me 10 years to do a better job taking care of it and hopefully avoid the current state it’s in now.

  • RBWells@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    Probably 65, as 45 was my vampire age, and I have enjoyed the time since that age. I am not sure I’d like to go back to fertility though. Think about it, say you take it at 40, menarche around 15 and menopause around 55, that’s periods for 60 years instead of 40 years, and twenty extra years you might get pregnant.

    I’ve had some time to think on this, I still say probably 65. I waffled for awhile because I would like to have the build I had before the last 2 children, but keep the kids, the ten pound wonder blew out my abs and skin which happily bounced completely back several times did not make a complete recovery with the last. But the 3 additional years I spent nursing them provides additional protection vs. breast cancer, don’t think I’d want to give up their half of that. And I have literally felt better and healthier in the years after 40, so rather have more of those.