2 picks for me: Stardew Valley, most boring shit ever, I don’t see the appeal, seriously how the hell did that thing sold 20 million copies?

And Witcher 3, I own that game since 2019 and I regret buying it, funny thing is that I’ve finished Dragon Age 1 and 2, which are kinda same genre but I actually enjoyed those games. I guess the old BioWare sauce carried those games unlike Witcher where there’s nothing to enjoy in its massive pointless world.

  • frankPodmore@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    48
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    FIFA. Every man and boy in England loves FIFA, except me. I find it totally boring and pointless.

    • Kimdracula@sh.itjust.worksOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      The game is popular but isn’t universally beloved, even the fans hate it, but they got the monopoly in football games

    • Hemingways_Shotgun@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      Just like any sport game, I only enjoy FIFA in small doses.

      Sports games are literally the definition of “playing the same game over and over again”. I can only ever do maybe a handful of games in a “season” before I start just simming and focusing solely on the management side of things. And even that doesn’t last more than a season. I don’t think there’s any sports game where I’ve run more than one or two seasons.

      • Kimdracula@sh.itjust.worksOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        PES back in the day had an amazing manager mode. And become a legend mode was so much better than fifa career. Being just one player and starting in small forgotten clubs and going all the way up to the champions league plus trying to win the “fifa” World Cup was addicting back in the day.

    • Blackmist@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Sensible Soccer was the last football game I was able to get into.

      On the Amiga, not the shitty remake.

  • Varyk@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    44
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Elden ring yawwwwn.

    It’s beautiful, and it seems like an interesting world, but learning exactly how to dodgerollattack for every enemy with deliberately delayed reflexes is not my kinda fun.

    • NotNotMike@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’ll go ahead and say this also includes all “Souls-like” games for me.

      Combat seems clunky, buggy, and unnecessarily difficult. I don’t have a ton of time to play games, so when I do, I want it to be relaxing.

      • Varyk@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I hear the lore’s really interesting and some guy linked me a YouTube channel full of elden ring lore so I might look into that.

        But playing it, not so much.

        • tyler@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          I don’t even think the lore is interesting. I played maybe 5 hours before giving up because my friend told me that the creator literally wrote the story and then had them scramble it up and remove sections so you’ll never ever get the actual full story. Then they proceed to hide it behind a bunch of meaningless drivel. Utterly stupid game to me.

          • Varyk@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            That doesn’t sound like engaging plot delivery on part of the creator, and the gameplay wasn’t my style at all, although I did like the character, creature and world design and am interested to see how this guy presents the lore.

            As it was introduced to me, it’s a guy who enjoyed playing but really enjoyed the main story and wen into a deep dive connecting every little scrap of lore to put together a full history.

            I like that kind of stuff, so I’ll give it a whirl

  • SorteKanin@feddit.dk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    1 year ago

    Any first person shooter. I’m just not into something that requires that kind of reflexes and precision, especially with a first person perspective where you can be killed instantly from behind.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      I agree. On top of that, I get motion sick really easily, so I can play a lot of FPS games for about 15 minutes max.

    • vonbaronhans@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Or if you develop wrist pain… most FPSs just go right out the window. Or you play on controller and get whomped by the mouse and keyboard players.

      • BURN@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Controller is actually better in most modern FPS games due to over tuned aim assist. Gone are the days of mnk supremacy in fps games

          • BURN@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            The way it’s worked for a few years is that the bottom half of controller players are about even with the mid tier mnk players and then the top tier controller players are better than the top tier mnk players.

            It’s not an issue if you only play casually, but if you get into the high level competitive stuff it quickly becomes seen.

            I wish I was bad enough to not be part of the group affected. Games would be so much more fun

  • vividspecter@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Pretty much every first party Nintendo game, especially Mario and the Zelda series. I’ve had some enjoyment from the 2D era Zelda games at least, but have yet to finish any of them as they just don’t seem to hold my attention.

    I’ll reserve my judgement on the most recent Zelda game as I understand it’s quite different from the classic 3D and 2D games, but I don’t have any particular desire to give Nintendo money given their increasingly lawyer heavy behaviour.

      • Khrux@ttrpg.network
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I really enjoyed Breath of the Wild although I haven’t tried Tears for the Kingdom. It really suited me but it’s lack of direction is how I play every open world game anyway. I actually can’t go back to other AAA open world games without getting irritated by how hand holding and limiting they are of their own medium, but it wasn’t just breath of the wild that made me realise that.

        • Bibliotectress@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’d you enjoyed Breath of the Wild, you’ll probably love Tears of the Kingdom. Some people felt it wasn’t different enough from Breath of the Wild, but there’s so much more to explore. And there was a part in the story that was so emotional, it made me ugly cry.

          • Khrux@ttrpg.network
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            I am pretty sure I’d love tears of the kingdom, I just don’t have a switch.vi played breath of the wild on a friend’s Wii U years ago while living with him, then tried to replay it with an emulator a while later but encountered a few big bugs.

            My hope is to just wait 5 years and play a stable emulation of Tears of the Kingdom, or maybe by then I’ll be able to pick that and the console up quick.

  • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’ve just never gotten into Pokemon. The games just feel like 99% grinding. I’m sure that’s an incredibly unpopular opinion, but I still find them unspeakably dull.

    • EnderMB@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s weird, because Pokémon didn’t invent turn-based RPG’s, nor did they even invent the pocket monster genre because Dragon Warrior Monster arguably had a better game than Pokémon out around the same time - with more monsters, breeding, and a better storyline.

      But Red/Blue and Gold/Silver were great games of their time. Very basic, but great, mostly because of the world built around them. If you didn’t appreciate Pokémon, it’s probably easy to see why you’d find it dull.

      • I Cast Fist@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Worth mentioning, regarding Dragon Quest, the monster teaming up with the player was added in DQ5, back in 1992, something that was arguably first introduced in Megami Tensei 2 (1990). Dragon Quest Monster was released only in 1998, after the first pokemon games.

        What set pokemon apart from them was the amount of pokemon you could get. That Game Freak managed to cram another 100 in Gold/Silver, a night/day cycle, berries, friendship, breeding and the entire original Kanto region in a gameboy color cart is a small miracle

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        I don’t even mind some turn-based RPGs. I mentioned Wasteland in another comment, which I loved. Wasteland was basically remade as Fallout 1. Fallout 1, 2 and the Wasteland games which now have their own sequels are all turn-based RPGs, but they give you so many more options than Pokemon and they are also about team building since you don’t play as a single character.

        I guess Pokemon was just not the game for me. 🤷‍♂️

      • TJDetweiler@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        That’s funny, it’s the opposite for me. Got into Satisfactory, loved it. Buddy bought me factorio, and now Satisfactory seems like an extremely feature-neutered version of Factorio.

        • Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I will grant you, you can build much more granular things in Factorio, it’s nittier and grittier. I’m real excited to play the full release this September.

        • BURN@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          This is how I’ve always felt about satisfactory. It’s so much more limiting in every way than factorio

    • Zacryon@lemmy.wtf
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Picked up Satisfactory just a few days ago and I am pretty bored tbh. Does it get better?

        • Zacryon@lemmy.wtf
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I already got the MAM. Currently working towards delivering those 50 Smart Platings for the space elevator’s platform assembly project.

          • Magicalus@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Oh, then you’re about to unlock phase 1, right? I’d say that’s pretty much the biggest wall in the game. There are others, but the path to unlocking phase 1 is generally the biggest slog.

  • MelonYellow@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I never really got into the Pokémon games. Don’t find turn-based combat very fun. I mean, I guess turn-based is easy and relaxing for when you just want to put your game down and take breaks.

    • PenisWenisGenius@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Oh man I hate turn based combat. It’s the worst possible combat system. If you try to fight enemies more powerful or numerous than you, you just lose and that’s all there is to it. Anything besides turn based actually allows you to benefit from skill and strategy. Factors besides enemy numbers and level play a much larger role in how the fighting plays out.

          • msantossilva@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            I am sincerely curious what kind of turn-based RPGs you have been playing where you dont have complete control over your actions and the combat. The only real difference between action and turn based is that in the latter things happen in a syncronous, lockstep manner. And the reason for that is to allow the player to think every action through. The outcome of the combat should be a product of your good and bad decisions. Hence why turn-based games tend to be more tactical.

            Also, in my experience, turn-based RPGs tend to offer a much wider range of actions for the player to choose from. The same would probably not be feasable in an (pure) action RPG due to its real-time nature.

            The quintessential turn-based game is chess. Are you telling me that you think chess does not require skill or that the players are not in control?

      • I Cast Fist@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Anything besides turn based actually allows you to benefit from skill and strategy

        korean mmos entered the chat

        For anyone unaware, pretty much every korean mmo game is a numbers game, where skill and strategy always lose to numbers.

  • AwkwardLookMonkeyPuppet@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    1 year ago

    Animal Crossing. I have friends who became obsessed with that game. They wouldn’t stop pestering me about how much I would love it, and how I should start playing so we could trade turnips or some shit. Anyways, I bought it. What a weird thing to be obsessed with. It was boring, childish, and pointless. But it was hugely popular for a period of time.

    • Zedd @lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Fucking chore simulator. My roommates couldn’t be assed to do their actual chores, but every morning during covid they’d get up and make sure their fucking farms had whatever the shit they needed.

    • SoleInvictus@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      I bought it for the same reasons and also hated it. It just felt empty and boring. I then had to bite my tongue so hard when those friends would start gushing about their latest Animal Crossing thing.

  • androogee (they/she)@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Anything with that boring lazy Batman Arkham fighting system that they put in every game anymore.

    It’s such a shitty mechanic. I don’t understand why people like it. It’s just an extended QuickTime event. The same identical QuickTime event, over and over again, for fucking hours. It wasn’t so bad in Arkham because the stealth was so fun that I never fought unless I had to.

    But for 15 years it’s infected every other goddamn game. Shadows of Mordor, Mad Max, Ghosts of Tsushima off the top of my head.

    It sucks. It’s awful. Harrumph.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      At first I liked it because it was good for people like me who like games but are really not good at them, but yeah, it’s way overdone now.

    • Blackmist@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s weird because I always think of it as the Sands of Time combat system.

    • Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      …ghost of Tsushima has the best and most satisfying combat system in recent memory.

      The Perry was the most satisfying in any game (imo obviously).

  • PonyOfWar@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    1 year ago

    Well you picked two of my favorite games there… :p

    For me it’s Monster Hunter. There’s no appeal to me fighting endless boss fights grinding for better gear. People often compare it to Soulslikes, which I do like. But IMO Monster Hunter doesn’t have the best part of Soulslikes, which is the exploration of an intricate world full of mysteries.

    • 0ops@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      If someone hands me a controller I’ll button mash away because I’m just here to hang out, but I don’t really like the game either. Ditto Mario Cart

    • vonbaronhans@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      That’s… an interesting one. Uniquely frustrating from what sort of perspective? Like, do other fighting games work for you but platform fighters don’t? Or are fighting games in general just not your thing?

      • potoooooooo ☑️@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        The control scheme, the health bar system, and the general chaos just never hit right for me. I can appreciate the game in a party setting, but maybe a little begrudgingly. In maybe similar veins, I’d prefer Towerfall or Power Stone 2, for example.

    • SorteKanin@feddit.dk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I get the complaint, it feels like it could be so tactical and strategic but often you get fucked by bad luck. But that’s kinda rogue likes for you I guess. Wonder if there was a way to design it differently.

    • Zedd @lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m having that problem with slay the spire currently. I’ve spent 50 hours trying to beat it with the witch character, and keep getting fucked by the RNG. FTL I’ve beat with every ship/variation on normal, but it takes a lot of Memorization or looking up events to make sure you’re not screwing yourself. Into the Breach is way less RNG.

  • Edge004@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Bioshock. I like the story and setting, but I find the actual gameplay to be boring

    • Zacryon@lemmy.wtf
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Same. Played it through using cheats just to get through the story. Bioshock Infinte was a pleasure though.

  • Vaginal_blood_fart@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Baldurs gate 3. Just too much going on and I can’t figure it out. Never passed the first board. Also elden ring can get fucked.

    • Razzazzika@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      First board? Not sure what that means… the tutorial? On the nautiloid? You are missing out on so much

      • intensely_human@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I think he’s thinking of Build a Gate 3, which is indeed the most confusing game ever. It helps to think in terms wood grain, and it really helps if you get the carpentry instruction from BaG 1 and 2.